User talk:Joanalcaraz

AfC notification: User:Joanalcaraz/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Joanalcaraz/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Basic Groups of Participants in (Interactive) Planning

Planning is the integral process and sub-processes of time and space that deals with preparation, formulation and fruition of decisions about the future (Brkovic, 1992). On the other hand, Dror (1973) defined planning as a process, whether in formal and legal matters, wherein decisions will have to be approved and implemented by some other body, or a decision maker. It is a set of plan and consequences that needs to be laid down for a decision maker to make an appropriate and reasonable selection. Milovanovic (2003) believed that there is an entire chain of a defined process of decision making, and in planning, there are various participants with various intent of actions. Laurini (2001) suggested that there are three essential links between the participants in planning: politicians, planners and citizens. Sandman (1993) delineated the participant groups who are significant in the conversation about the problems in community: technical experts, media, neighbours, activists, interested citizens, business and industrial team, selected officials, administration of local, regional and national level. However, interested parties are not always participant parties. According to Healey (1989), participants can be divided in to three main clusters: income-based sector, administration and non-government organizations as a form of organized citizens. For them the classifications of the participants are anchored on their roles in decision-making. These are the: proposers, decision makers and the public as the third and last interested party (Healey, 1989). Milovanovic (2003) stressed that in planning, awareness is the paramount motive for an indepth participation from the different groups. The quality of plan is highly dependent on the quality of life and the quality of space attached to the plan. Citizens as participants of the plan are strongly concern only of those outcome that will affect them personally (Pusic, 2001). The differences in capabilities, resources, and qualifications also influence the quality of the decisions. Because of these differences, Millovanovic (2003) suggested to create a division of the participants to warrant the participation of the public and other interest groups.

Works Cited

Brkovic, B. M. (1992). Predavanja iz urbanistickog i prostornog planiranja. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Dror, Y. (1973). The planning process: A Reader in Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. London: Macmillan.

Laurini, R. (2001). Information Systems for Urban Plannig. London: Taylor and Francis.

Milovanovic, D. (2003). Interactive planning - use of the ICT as a support for public participation in planning urban development: Serbia nad Montenegro cases. 39th ISoCaRP Congress 2003.

Pusic, L. (2001). Odrzivi grad: ka jednoj sociologiji okruzenja. Beograd: Nova 175.

Joanalcaraz (talk) 05:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Basic Groups of Participants in (Interactive) Planning
Planning is the integral process and sub-processes of time and space that deals with preparation, formulation and fruition of decisions about the future (Brkovic, 1992). On the other hand, Dror (1973) defined planning as a process, whether in formal and legal matters, wherein decisions will have to be approved and implemented by some other body, or a decision maker. It is a set of plan and consequences that needs to be laid down for a decision maker to make an appropriate and reasonable selection. Milovanovic (2003) believed that there is an entire chain of a defined process of decision making, and in planning, there are various participants with various intent of actions. Laurini (2001) suggested that there are three essential links between the participants in planning: politicians, planners and citizens. Sandman (1993) delineated the participant groups who are significant in the conversation about the problems in community: technical experts, media, neighbours, activists, interested citizens, business and industrial team, selected officials, administration of local, regional and national level. However, interested parties are not always participant parties. According to Healey (1989), participants can be divided in to three main clusters: income-based sector, administration and non-government organizations as a form of organized citizens. For them the classifications of the participants are anchored on their roles in decision-making. These are the: proposers, decision makers and the public as the third and last interested party (Healey, 1989). Milovanovic (2003) stressed that in planning, awareness is the paramount motive for an indepth participation from the different groups. The quality of plan is highly dependent on the quality of life and the quality of space attached to the plan. Citizens as participants of the plan are strongly concern only of those outcome that will affect them personally (Pusic, 2001). The differences in capabilities, resources, and qualifications also influence the quality of the decisions. Because of these differences, Millovanovic (2003) suggested to create a division of the participants to warrant the participation of the public and other interest groups.

Works Cited

Brkovic, B. M. (1992). Predavanja iz urbanistickog i prostornog planiranja. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Dror, Y. (1973). The planning process: A Reader in Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. London: Macmillan.

Laurini, R. (2001). Information Systems for Urban Plannig. London: Taylor and Francis.

Milovanovic, D. (2003). Interactive planning - use of the ICT as a support for public participation in planning urban development: Serbia nad Montenegro cases. 39th ISoCaRP Congress 2003.

Pusic, L. (2001). Odrzivi grad: ka jednoj sociologiji okruzenja. Beograd: Nova 175.

Help me!
Please help me with... I created a new topic under TALK page, will this be reviewed automatically? It is necessary for my contribution to be approved as this is part of my school requirements. Thank you so much. Joanalcaraz (talk) 05:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * We can't guarantee that any draft be approved. Please ask your teachers to work with the Wiki Education Foundation. I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 06:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Joanalcaraz/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Joanalcaraz/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=od_theses_msod. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Waggie (talk) 05:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Joanalcaraz! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Waggie (talk) 06:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Joanalcaraz/sandbox


Hello, Joanalcaraz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)