User talk:Joanelle Romero

April 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Joanelle Romero, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Joanelle Romero ‎. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

There's a problem with your username
Greetings! I notice you've edited the article Joanelle Romero. The issue is that your username is User:Joanelle Romero; this creates a potential problem with our username policy.


 * If you are not Romero, then this account will be blocked for impersonation.


 * If you are Romero, then you will need to contact the Volunteer Response Team via email to verify your identity. Once they verify your identity, though, you should still refrain from editing the article about you: the subject of an article always has a conflict of interest. You may suggest changes on the article talk page; independent editors will review the edits and make them if the comply with Wikipedia guidelines and are supported by reliable sources.

If you are going to contact the VRT, please reply to indicate that you are doing so, but do not leave any off-Wikipedia contact information on this page. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
I ma trying to let you know I'd like to edit my page Joanelle Romero, please provide link so I can send the updated information because the info now on my page is incorrect!

Thank you Joanelle Romero

Please help me with...

Joanelle Romero (talk) 04:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for finding places where information is out-of-date and offering to correct it! One of wikipedia's core policies is verifiability, which is especially important as this is a fairly anonymous website that can have real-world implications for the subjects of its articles. As a result, we can't just trust that anyone claiming to be the subject (or claiming to have personal knowledge) actually is or knows as claimed. Instead, content needs to be based on known reliable sources, for example, published media reports, library references, etc. DMacks (talk) 05:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)