User talk:Joanna Halliwell

Speedy deletion nomination of Joanna Halliwell


A tag has been placed on Joanna Halliwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jared Preston (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Saskia
If you want to add an article about a Glee character called Sakia you don't do it by blanking an existing article. If the character from Glee really merits an article (and I have no opinion on that) then either use the characters full name - if known, or call the article Saskia (Glee character), then if you want to link to it but don't want the bit in brackets to show up you use this code Saskia. NtheP (talk) 16:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Santana Lopez, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AndieM ''  (Leave a message!)  16:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Quinn Fabray, you may be blocked from editing. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rachel Berry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please follow the instructions on the page and discuss controversial additions on the article talk page first. NtheP (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for adding false and nonsense information to articles. You have been warned here on your talkpage repeatedly, but chose to ignore all warnings and continue your disruptive behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Glee Episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not ignore in-text comments; they're there for a reason. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Unhelpful Glee edits
Joanna, you are beginning a cycle of increasingly unhelpful and in many ways inaccurate edits on the Glee pages. I can understand mistakenly adding an infobox on the Characters of Glee article, as you might not understand that infoboxes are inappropriate for that page.

However, you are ignoring, and in many cases deleting, in-line comments that are there because of past editing disagreements that were decided by consensus should be handled in a certain way. This is not the way Wikipedia works. If you insist on continuing to ignore these comments, or adding information that is questionable or flat-out incorrect, there will be further notes here about disruptive editing, and it will inevitably lead to you being blocked again.

Your latest edit to the Santana Lopez article is a case in point. Sam Evans has been deemed not to be a significant other because the relationship was quickly discarded by Santana, yet you ignored the note that any change should be discussed on the talk page and changed it anyway.

Please stop and think what you really wish to accomplish on Wikipedia. We love having new editors who help improve articles. But unhelpful and incorrect changes will be reversed in short order, and editors who persist in making them find themselves unable to edit for increasing periods of time. I hope you will decide to change your ways, and help. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Friends characters
Joanna as BlueMoonset said above you are adding unhelpful information to these articles. For example Joey & Rachel were never married therefore they were not spouses. That they dated is detailed in the article. Infoboxes do not have to contain every single piece of information about a character, just that which is very significant. If you can't understand some of the way things work on Wikipedia or learn what good editing is about please ask or you will find yourself banned from editing again. NtheP (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Stop
Just please stop changing information on articles that is either wrong or unsourced. It's getting boring now. Bleaney (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Potter, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits on this article were so completely inappropriate it's hard to even begin explaining. And it's far from the only problematic edit you made this evening. Here's a simple rule of thumb: do not, ever, put anything into an infobox for a person or a fictional character that has not yet happened, or has never happened. Infoboxes reflect up to the present day, and no further. Ever. If you don't wish to follow Wikipedia rules and guidelines, do not expect to retain your ability to make changes to its articles. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Radcliffe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan Groff, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Putting blatantly false claims such as Groff being engaged to Lea Michele taints every edit you do: if you can't be trusted in your edits, it isn't safe to let any of them stand, even if the occasional one happens to be correct. Is this truly how you want yourself to be viewed? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Glee episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glee (season 4)


The article Glee (season 4) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * As article itself states, Glee has yet to be renewed for a fourth season, so an article violates WP:CRYSTAL as well as WP:V (no announcement to be verified). The creator is an author who has had virtually all her edits reverted, including one on the article she copied this material from, List of Glee Episodes, mostly due to adding untrue or incorrect information to existing articles, and refuses to engage on her Talk page. Note that she says season 4 will start on September 20 2013, a date she has made up and is clearly untrue as the season is unannounced, and would begin in fall 2012 if the show is renewed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Glee (season 4) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glee (season 4) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Glee (season 4) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)