User talk:Joannalieber

Welcome!
Hello, Joannalieber, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cathy pill, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  13:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Could you please change the article name to

Cathy Pill (Capital P?)

Thank you

Joanna


 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cathy pill


The article Cathy pill has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Fiddle  Faddle  13:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cathy pill has been reverted. Your edit here to Cathy pill was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=BE&v=tPoMKmWHx4w) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Cathy Pill. JohnCD (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Referencing Cathy Pill
The trick is always to have after the references.

But there is a major problem with this set of references: The great list on numbers in the reference list at the top is virtually useless. Please migrate them to the text to exemplify what they are meant to show. They really do need to be inline references. Fiddle  Faddle  12:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I think you have a basic misunderstanding of inline references. The pair go with precisive exactly by the item you are referencing in the text itself. picks these up and puts them in place instead of itself in the references section. What you (or others) seem to have done is to name the reference and plonk it in the references section, and THEN put the name in the text. Please do not do this. I've just spent a while sorting that out for you.
 * When you find a home in the text for the remaining references that are physically IN the references section, please MOVE them to the right place, bodily. Any questions please ask me on my talk page. Fiddle   Faddle  13:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)