User talk:Joannapo

Articles for deletion nomination of Grown Up
I have nominated Grown Up, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Grown Up. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 02:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pro and Con
I have nominated Pro and Con, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pro and Con. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 02:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pro and Con
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pro and Con. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Pro and Con. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Rubber Stamp Film


The article The Rubber Stamp Film has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I was only able to find one reliable source to verify so much as its existence, nothing to establish the "significant coverage" required by the general notability guideline and the film-specific guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HJMitchell   You rang?   20:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

A page you started (North of Blue) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating North of Blue, Joannapo!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Interesting article!"

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanna Priestley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voices ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Joanna_Priestley check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Joanna_Priestley?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)