User talk:Joao88mestre

Recent additions to Pine Processionary
Hi. I see you've added materials to this article today. At the moment these are not really of the quality we need for the article: the biggest problem is that the references are not connected to the text (please see WP:REFB if this is new to you) so it is hard to see what to do - I considered deleting all of it but am hoping that won't be necessary. The other immediate issue is reliability - blogs and similar sources (facebook, youtube etc) are not generally usable because they may be confused, wrong, or simply invented. If you could start by putting in some references we can think how to take this forward. Thanks - Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo again, I'd be glad if we could start a dialogue on this article (i.e. --- REPLY, PLEASE!) because you have essentially ignored my earlier questions and are overloading the article with a lot of material of questionable relevance, poorly formatted and copy-edited. I understand you are a researcher on a topic related to this moth, but that does not mean you can unload and publicise your research here.

Please could you explain what you are trying to do, and we can work out the most appropriate path. I currently do not believe many of the additions are appropriate to an article on the moth itself - much of the text is too long, and some is explicitly on control, which should likely go in another article. With many thanks for your co-operation, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)