User talk:Joao E. Ribeiro/Communist uprising of 1935

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

The article has an abundance of substantial information. The information is written in a neutral fashion. There are substantial contributions by the author that help us understanding the changing dynamic of the Cuban Revolution.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

There aren't any sources, so I am unsure if this information is reliable. By adding citations, we can verify the information is true and accurate. More citations are needed, and there needs to be a wide variety of them. Also, there are a few grammatical errors throughout the article, though they are minor. All that's needed to improve that is a close proofread.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

Most importantly, add citations/sources. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know

I need to put a lot of information like this article does.