User talk:Joaquin008/Archive 1

File permission problem with File:BernardHopkins.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BernardHopkins.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Barret (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BernardHopkins.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:BernardHopkins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Barret (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DanielPoncedeLeon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DanielPoncedeLeon.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Barret (talk) 12:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VitaliKlitschkovsChrisArreola.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VitaliKlitschkovsChrisArreola.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PaulWilliamsvsWinkyWright.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PaulWilliamsvsWinkyWright.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Steven Pienaar
Thanks for your message. The source seems sufficiently reliable to me, but more would need to be done to properly establish it as a WP:RS. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I am indeed and am anticipating kick-off in Rustenberg, but I'd be enjoying it all much more if this team had won this match. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Miguel Cotto vs. Yuri Foreman DYK
FYI I requested clarification of your proposed hook at T:TDYK. –Grondemar 16:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Marlon Stockinger
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Miguel Cotto vs. Yuri Foreman
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Bam Aquino
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Cork City Players
The player has only just signed and I have to be honest, he has made appearances in the Danish divisions but I don't know how many. I've found two previous clubs he was with (Ikast and Tjörring IF), but no list of appearances or anything. He's a goalkeeper and is right now our second choice, it would be crazy to get rid of him from wiki as he will probably get a game very very soon-especially as we have Cup matches coming up. A goalkeeper can't be just thrown in and out so quickly, but if he's your second choice his relevance to the team and its supporters is quite high. I'm trying my best to flesh out the articles on Cork City but the media articles on the League of Ireland First Division are low compared to the top flight, and it is a slow process. I know there is a long running argument about LOI players being included, especially those that have yet to make an appearance in the first team, but surely a man who only signed this month could be given a little bit of time? --Joseph McSweeney (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I concur. Admittedly I am also a Cork City fan but Piechnik will very likely soon be the first choice goalkeeper for one of the most popular teams in Ireland. A wiki reader looking for information on the club, including quite possibly Danes with no real knowledge of the club (beyond it's defeat of neighbours Malmo FF in 2004), should be informed about him. Given that he may even be playing tonight in a game against Mervue, it would be at very least awkwardly pedantic to delete him now. GavinZac (talk) 13:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 13:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello Joaquin008, I'm Airplaneman. I saw your contribs while new page patrolling. Thanks for helping out. I looked at your last 100 contributions and it seems like you're not always using an edit summary. It is advisable to do this 100 percent of the time; there is even a preference you can set (in your preferences) to help remind you to use them. Edit summaries are good for explaining your edits and help avoid misunderstandings when others view your edits. Regards, Airplaneman   ✈  18:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Eduard Folayang
Hello! Your submission of Eduard Folayang at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sasata (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Eduard Folayang
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

hello from foobarnix
hello Joaquin008. Thank you for the greeting. I was attempting to create a page called "Judith (Hebbel)" which said "Judith is a play written in 1841 by German dramatist Christian Friedrich Hebbel." My Edit summary said, "new page needed to distinguish Hebbel play from play of same name by Giraudoux." It immediately vanished. Did I do something wrong?Foobarnix (talk) 16:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

follow-on about Judith (Hebbel)
I added the page because there is a problem--There are two plays named "Judith". "Judith" in the article "Chrstian Hebbel" directs to "Judith (play)" which is by Giraudoux. I was about to fix the links in "Judith (disambiguation)" and "Chrstian Hebbel" to all point to the new stub. I figured that once the stub existed, I or someone else could expand it laterFoobarnix (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

final word about Judith (Hebbel)
Thanks for reentering the article. I believe my mistake was that I forgot to include "play-stub" in curly brackets in my initial attempt and that is why the article disappeared. I also fixed the pointer in Judith (disambiguation) to point to the correct play. A nice learning experience.Foobarnix (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Jeffrey Vinokur
You might want to look at this AFD, the author dug up some sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

About Codewit Global Network ry
Hello Joaquin, I am Xu Cin, a chinese studying in Helsinki. I attended a workshop on Codewit self development workshop last saturday. Today I was browsing about them and noticed that their organsiation was about to be deleted in wikipedia. I was wondering why. Please take your time to reserach more about them and checjk their website too at Codewit Global Network Ry. probably you will observe that they are not suppose to deleted. that is my opinion anyway.

Thank you for listening to me. Xuci-p (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Loch, Victoria and other Victorian towns
Hi Joaquin008. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, creating micro-stubs like Loch, Victoria and Koonwarra, Victoria do not really help grow the encyclopedia. If merely restating the article name is the best we can do, then perhaps it is best to wait until we have some sources that allow us to create an article. It is OK to allow red links to remain on a page or in a template until someone can write at least a solid stub. Cheers, Mattinbgn (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Autopatroller
Hi Joaquin008, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 16:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

TfD of Template: Economy of Pakistan
I would request that you have a look on the discussion of TfD for Template: Economy of Pakistan. Thanks! Farjad 0322 (talk&#124;contribs) 18:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Indonesian localities
Thank you for recent additions - please note that the Indonesian project regularly has problems with editors adding localities that are marginal WP:N localities - the project encourages the proper use of WP:RS to enhance articles to allow for WP:V and WP:N to satisfy the proper addition of clearly notable localities - where possible the http://toolserver.org/~enwp10/bin/list2.fcgi?run=yes&projecta=Indonesia&importance=Unknown-Class&quality=Unassessed-Class class is an unmamanaged list that the project needs help in reducing - thank you SatuSuro 00:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Note for notability
I added new secondary sources to IEEE AlexSB page, please take a look.--MOHAMED ELRAYANY (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

How do I change my user name?
Basic question- as I think mine is too related to the topic I'm posting about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by River-rye (talk • contribs) 15:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress
I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 15:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Susan Hacker Stang
I am trying to make my article on Susan Hacker Stang "live" with links on Wikipedia. She is an excellent Photographer and professor. I am trying to link two of her photographs that she ok's permission copyright to me-to post on the wikipedia page I have created about her. Sheri Boston sbostondesigns@aol.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sboston (talk • contribs) 22:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Ross (basketball)


The article Chris Ross (basketball) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Burtscher


The article Michael Burtscher has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josh Urbiztondo


The article Josh Urbiztondo has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Notability Question
Hello Joaquim, Thanks for the welcome. I have made a number of contributions and corrections since i joined Wikipedia with little trouble. However, i was about to create an article on a school and i was wondering what i would to meet the 'notability clause of Wikipedia'. What files do i need to include to justify my proposed inclusion of the school in the journals of Wikipedia.

Kind regards Carlang (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)