User talk:Joaquinito25

November 2016
Hello Joaquinito25. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Dewrance & Co. Ltd. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. ''Further, you clearly have no understanding of the meaning of vandalism on wikipedia. Although very much a stub article, it nonetheless is accurate and in good faith. I don't know what history you have here, but I would advise caution.'' Muffled Pocketed  14:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dewrance & Co. Ltd. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed  14:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Peridon (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You must not put blocking templates on other users' talk pages. You are not an administrator and do not have the right to block anyone. If you continue to mess with Dewrance & Co. Ltd, you are likely to be blocked yourself without further warning. Peridon (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Rathfelder, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to this, you may be blocked from editing. ''If you make another edit that attacks or in any way harasses this or any other editor, I will request admnnistrative action be taken to rein you in. You clearly have a beef; I suggest you leave it at the door. Thanks! '' Muffled Pocketed  14:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)