User talk:Joblf

AfD nomination of Etienne Kuypers
I've nominated Etienne Kuypers, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Etienne Kuypers satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Etienne Kuypers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Etienne Kuypers during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Sala Skan  21:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Email
Could you perhaps specify an email address? You can do this by clicking my preferences, entering a valid email address and clicking "Enable e-mail from other users". This way, other users can contact you. Perhaps someone can help you with writing a good article about Kuypers.  Sala Skan  19:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you please enter one?  Sala Skan  10:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Warning
If you have something to say, do so calmly, civilly and rationally. Don't make personal attacks. Don't ever tell another editor "I think you are paranoid, or sick otherwise." One more attack and you're blocked. The choice is yours. A ecis Brievenbus 15:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear,

I agree fully, but do you have any idea of the insultst your collegues made to me? Do you want to block them too? ... The point is that they do not act rationally, that is the big problem in this whole discussion? They do not show any knowledge of the things we wrote in the article, but they keep on threatning and insulting. It is very difficult to keep calm at that point, although I ask EVERYTIME arguments and rational behaviour on them. I am curious if you want to block them too..

Thanks for your help, anyway.

regards, job

Etienne Kuypers
The problem was that the article was a translation of the subject's website. Translations of copyrighted material are derivative work, and as such, posting it here constitutes a copyright violation. The other concern was that the subject did not meet notability guidelines. You can go to WP:DRV if you still want to contest the deletion. --Core desat 07:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Etienne Kuypers
Please do not recreate deleted articles. They will be deleted again, and you may get blocked when repeatedly recreating an article.  Sala Skan  20:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear Sala,

The article was completely rewritten. For me it is completely normal to rewrite deleted articles. Have you read my new text? Again it was no good? If you think this concept was also no good: what can I do, to write an article on dr. Kuypers to your criteria? There was nothing that referred to his own website, there were many primary sources, many secundary sources and references. It is a complete surprise to me, that the new text is also deleted. So; what can I do, to write an article to your satisfaction?

Many thanks for your help and answer.

regards, Job

This is your final warning. The next time you recreate deleted articles, you will be blocked from editing.  Sala Skan  23:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

He or she did it again today. Hu 19:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia . Please read up on our vandalism policy, Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and what Wikipedia is. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia when the block expires, but please only make pages and edits that improve Wikipedia. Daniel Case 20:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)