User talk:Jocelyn doubleday

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the explanation, thanks @Arjayay Jocelyn doubleday (talk) 22:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Barbara Ferrer
Hello, Jocelyn doubleday. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barbara Ferrer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbara Ferrer (September 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barbara Ferrer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barbara Ferrer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Barbara_Ferrer Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cabrils&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Barbara_Ferrer reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

NPOV concerns
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Robert W. Malone. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  18:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Barbara Ferrer has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Barbara Ferrer. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbara Ferrer (American health official) has been accepted
 Barbara Ferrer (American health official), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Barbara_Ferrer_(American_health_official) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! MurielMary (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Baltazar Fedalizo
Hello, Jocelyn doubleday,

Thank you for creating Baltazar Fedalizo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"As this person is a candidate, notability as given in WP:POLITICIAN must be met.

The references given do not address the biography of this person.

More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.
 * 1) Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
 * 2) Be completely independent of the article subject.
 * 3) Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
 * 4) Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.


 * 1) Interviews are Primary sources. See WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baltazar Fedalizo


A tag has been placed on Baltazar Fedalizo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * This is uncalled for. Jocelyn doubleday (talk) 22:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello Jocelyn doubleday. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jocelyn doubleday. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Baltazar Fedalizo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baltazar Fedalizo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Baltazar Fedalizo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not compensated directly or indirectly for this or any other page creation or edits I've made. What seems to be the issue with the page? I'm trying to do better adhering to the rules and guidelines but I'm still a notice. Please tell me what I am missing. Jocelyn doubleday (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * novice Jocelyn doubleday (talk) 22:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your accusation of discrimination
I note in this edit you have made the following veiled accusation: in direct response to my simple and policy based opinion to delete the article.

I can tell you with absolute clarity that this behaviour is not tolerated on Wikipedia. Neither discrimination nor accusations of discrimination are tolerated. Please read, understand, and always employ WP:CIVIL. Your comment was entirely uncivil. Please read, understand, and always employ WP:AGF. Your comment failed to assume good faith. Please take this message to you as an absolute formal warming as to your conduct here.

As a side issue, I had to look up the abbreviation AAPI. I can tell you with equal clarity that I do not discriminate against any ethnicity, colour, creed, secularity or any other discriminatory issue. I find your accusation grossly offensive and demeaning. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Jocelyn doubleday (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you recently removed content from Self-coup without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Apologies, it was done in error. Jocelyn doubleday (talk) 17:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your userpage
I removed the infobox from your userpage, as infoboxes are pretty much reserved for articles, and we need to make sure that userpages are not perceived as articles, draft articles or social-media-style profiles. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baltazar Fedalizo


A tag has been placed on Baltazar Fedalizo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Baltazar Fedalizo. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Grey joy talk 07:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)