User talk:JocularJellyfish/Archives/2017/May

''This is an archive of User talk:JocularJellyfish. Please do not change it in any way. – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 00:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC).''

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Mary Jo White
 * added a link pointing to Jay Clayton


 * United States Secretary of Foreign Affairs
 * added a link pointing to Robert R. Livingston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Neilgorsuchopinions
Template:Neilgorsuchopinions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Marvellous Spider-Man  17:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chuck Grassley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 17:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Daniel Webster (Florida politician)
Hi, thank you for your recent edits. I've reverted your edits to the Daniel Webster infobox, as its previous format conforms to Template:Infobox_officeholder, which explains the "prior_term" parameter. Thanks, Starrfruit (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Andrew G. McCabe does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. '' Please use your edit summary when you revert someone's edits. If you don't want to use it, then I will revert it as unexplained.'' Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 22:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Ted Yoho
Hi, I've reverted your edit to the Ted Yoho infobox, as its previous format conforms to Template:Infobox_officeholder, which explains how the predecessor and successor parameters should be used when districts are changed dramatically during redistricting. Thanks, Starrfruit (talk) 01:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Reverts on Ambassadors of the United States
Hi, can you explain to me why my edits were reverted when it's been documented that the nominees have been confirmed to their posts according to the Congressional Record? I'm at a loss. Snickers2686 (talk) 03:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

, I apologize for that. That was my mistake. I thought that Todd Philip Haskell was confirmed to be ambassador to the DRC and not the Republic of the Congo, so I reverted your edit. I then realized that my revert was wrong, so I reverted that. Once again, I apologize. JocularJellyfish (talk) 12:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Succession box order
Within WikiProject United States courts and judges, there is no established consensus regarding succession box order. And over hundreds of articles, slightly over half were arranged last to first and slightly under half were arranged first to last. Since late January, I have cleaned up over 1,000 articles, virtually all of the District/Court of Appeals/Trade Court under Clinton/G.W. Bush/Obama. Among other cleanup, I have arranged all those articles last to first. People were doing them both ways, so I arranged them all to the order that was slightly more prevalent to begin with. It may be backwards from the way other WikiProjects are doing it, but at least it is consistent within this WikiProject. Right now, I will leave them the way I currently have them, but if a consensus develops within WikiProject United States courts and judges to do it the other way, I will reverse them. Safiel (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael A. Raynor


The article Michael A. Raynor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ochib (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Re:Thapar
At the time, Thapar had not received his commission (or at least it wasn't noted) to the Court of Appeals, thus implying he was still seated on the district court. As of today FJC still says he's actively on both (being as his district court service hasn't been terminated yet) but I will let your revert stand since those edits will be done eventually. Now we just need to wait for a termination date on the district court. Snickers2686 (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)