User talk:Jodaviesuniessex

Speedy deletion nomination of University of Essex Knowledge Gateway


A tag has been placed on University of Essex Knowledge Gateway, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 80.42.113.189 (talk) 02:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jodaviesuniessex. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article University of Essex Knowledge Gateway, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 05:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Talk:University of Essex Knowledge Gateway
Just so you know, I've moved your comments on this page to the talkpage of the admin it was addressed to - User talk:Jimfbleak. Avic ennasis @ 18:30, 24 Shevat 5777 / 18:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, I deleted your article because Jimfbleak - talk to me?  19:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management.
 * you gave some references, but they were not in-line so we can't tell what fact each is supporting. Some of the references were clearly not independent third-party sources as defined in the link above. Put your independent references in the the text following the fact each supports using . Then   at the end will automatically generate a numbered list
 * There is little to show why it meets the notability criteria. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, or financial information. There is nothing in your text to say how much it's costing or where the cash is coming from
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. In particular, there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. Yours was littered with spamlinks to affiliated sites
 * You have declared a conflict of interest when editing this article, thank you for that. Since you work for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:     . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared.
 * If you decide to try again, please read this page first
 * If you want to reply to me, or have any questions, you can post on my talk page. You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~ when you post it.