User talk:JoeCool950/Archive 3

Monroe High School (Tehachapi)
Sorry, but I can't help with the Monroe High School (Tehachapi) article, short of what could be found online. As my user page notes, I'm from the east coast. —C.Fred (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

The right template
Joe, I was just trying to be helpful in correcting the userpage template (which is intended for user pages only) to the correct talkheader intended for talk pages like this one. Either template is optional, of course, but it's important to make sure you're using the right template on the right kind of page. - Dravecky (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Tehachapi Unified School District gutted due to copyvio
I replaced Tehachapi Unified School District with a stub due to a clear-cut copyright violation. Please expand it with your own words when you get a chance. Please check your other contributions for copyright violations and rewrite them in your own words where necessary. Thanks. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  20:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I also gutted a section from Monroe High School (Tehachapi) for the same reason. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  20:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Category:Continuation High schools and secondary schools
Are you planning on filling Category:Continuation High schools and secondary schools with all such schools?

If you are, I recommend you confine it to Category:Continuation_High_schools_in_California as the term "Continuation High Schools" seems to be unique to California and it seems to apply only to High Schools.

If you are not, I recommend re-categorizing Monroe High School (Tehachapi) to the same categories as Tehachapi High School and asking the categories to be speedy-deleted. See Categorization for more information on how Wikipedia uses categories. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  20:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with davidwr. It was a good idea, but I think the breakdown of categories is too much. When stub templates are created, for instance, it is expected that a category will have over 60 articles. So unless there are over 60 continuation high schools in Kern County, California, that subcategory isn't needed. We generally start with the most broad category available, and only create subcategories if the base is too large. Take Benjamin Franklin High School (New Orleans, Louisiana); the school is under Category:Charter schools in the United States. There are not enough Louisiana Charter schools for a subcategory. If continuation high schools are limited to just California, I think there should be the single category Category:Continuation High schools in California, and the rest of the categories should be deleted. If they exists throughout the U.S., limit the articles to just Category:Continuation High schools in the United States. Best, --Jh12 (talk) 15:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks great now! I went ahead and made the whole phrase "alternative high school" link to continuation high school. Feel free to change it back if you want. I'll also help check if there are any problems removing the continuation categories. Cheers, --Jh12 (talk) 14:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Ownership
Joe, you don't OWN the KVMX article or any other article on Wikipedia so you can't simply tell another editor "Don't change KVMX again" as you did here. - Dravecky (talk) 08:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Whatever--JoeCool950 (talk) 03:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Monroe High School.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Monroe High School.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, if that's okay


Dravecky (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rewriting KUZZ history
I am so sorry i did not get back to you in time. I have been very busy within the last few weeks and have not really been on wikipedia in a while. Now about KUZZ, I will most definitley rewrite the history section for KUZZ, Thats awesome that Buck Owen was tied to that station. I don't know when i will probably in a couple dys, because im goin' to the windy city for a couple of days. But don't worry I will get to it. (if you havent found anyone else to do it yet.) again sorry for not responding right away.

Merry Christmas! --Joemama993 (talk) 18:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

KUZZ History
I rewrote the KUZZ history page and here it is.

In 1958, KUZZ (then KIKK) first began broadcasting a country music format ON 800AM. In 1960, the station manager at the time which was at the time a local country and western star named "Cousin" Herb Henson, changed the calls to KUZZ. In 1966 country music singer Buck Owens purchased the station, but kept the country format. One year later in 1967, Owens also purchased the 107.9 frequency. When he bought it he did not actually start playing country music. He started it out as an alternative rock station. The calls letters for the new 107.9 would be KBBY-FM.

In 1969 after low ratings at 107.9, Owens flipped the station to country and western and changed the call letters to KZIN-FM. Both KUZZ and KZIN were both sister station and both played a country format but KZIN differed from KUZZ, by playing more new country than KUZZ. In 1977, plans were made to purchase rival country station AM 970 KBIS-AM. During that same time 800 AM was being sold to Four Square Gospel Church which was headquartered in Los Angeles. The plan for 800 AM was to flip the format from country to a christian format.

In January 1977 107.9 KZIN-FM flipped formats from country to an album oriented Rock station. The first song on the new 107.9 was "New Kid In Town" by the Eagles. The new calls letters were KKXX-FM. 800 AM KUZZ became a full time 24 hour country station. (It was not since this time. it was know as a "daytimer" and would only broadcast during the day and turn off at night.) In 1980, Buck Owens increased the power of KUZZ to 5,000 watts and also purchased another AM country radio station, 550 KAFY.

A couple years later, mangagement at the station 800 AM KUZZ and 550 KAFY, decided to exchange dial postitions. and KUZZ moved to 550 and 550 AM moved to 800 AM. As time went on AM radio just wasen't as big as it used to be. It was all about FM Radio now. People just were'nt listening to AM radio anymore. In 1988, after competiters were saying they would bring country music to the FM dial. Owens decidedto do that as well. He flipped rock station 107.9 KKXX to now country KUZZ.

Sorry for the long wait, but there you go. P.S I got a message from you about rewriting the WYCD airstaff section. I did'nt, I did though see what was going on. I was on one day and saw times and I thought that was cool, and hopefully that it stays, but it didnt. And I didnt want to cause anymore trouble so I just left it alone.

Anyway tell me what you think about the KUZZ history. Thanks! --Joemama993 (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

You have a message
I prefer to keep user-talk-page conversations together, see User_talk:Davidwr for my reply and a followup question. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  16:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Uploading Radio logo's
Hey, I need some help uploading logos for two radio stations. They RE Channel 9-5-5 (WKQI) in Detroit and the other is 95.7 The Wolf (KBWF) in San Fran. everytime i try to uploaed the logos it does not work. My guess is because my computer is crap, but IDK. Anyway if you want, could you upload those to picks. And if you do, Channel 9-5-5 does have a new logo, it is very similar to the one on the page, except it has the slogan "Detroit's Hit Music" under it.

Thanks! --Joemama993 (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

KERO-TV
Rather than reverting your edits (as you partially did mine), I'll explain to you why I made my changes.


 * Their digital signal actually is on VHF 10. They may PSIP map back to their analog channel number, but physically it's still channel 10. I don't know if they're moving their digital signal back to UHF 23 after analog switchoff on Feb. 17 (I'm assuming you live in Bakersfield, so you might know), but as of today their DT signal is still on 10, and that should be the channel number shown under the "digital channel" field. If KERO is indeed moving its DT signal back to 23 after Feb. 17, then change it to 23 on that date. Having "23" next to "VHF" just makes no sense.


 * I changed "it's" to "it is" because the Manual of Style clearly states that "use of contractions—such as don't, can't, won't, they'd, should've, it's—is informal and should be avoided".


 * I removed the mention of its previous CBS affiliation from the intro because the affiliation switch happened more than 10 years ago, and doesn't have any direct relevance to its current day-to-day operations. The CBS affiliation is also mentioned in the history section *and* the infobox, so it's not like this information disappeared off the page.


 * I removed that paragraph on their switch to Gari's Eyewitness News theme, because it really isn't that useful. Many ABC affiliates not owned by ABC itself use that theme, so KERO is hardly unique in this situation. Saying that "they might start broadcasting in HD soon, but we don't know when" isn't exactly useful info for readers either.


 * I removed that huge blurb on Lloyd Lindsay Young because a lot of it really has nothing to do with KERO (e.g. what he did before he joined KERO).

You might also want to know that under the Manual of Style, only the first letter of the first word should be capitalized unless the whole phrase is a proper noun. So the "News Operations" section should really be titled "News operation" (besides, they only have *ONE* news operation, right?), and similarly "Current Personalities" should really be "Current personalities".

Ultimately, I don't live in Bakersfield, nor do I work for KERO, so I don't have any vested interest in this article. I just felt the edits you made after mine didn't necessarily make the article better. Just my opinion. - Hinto (talk) 00:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Saw your edits to the article, and thanks for considering my input. - Hinto (talk) 17:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I took out some of the stuff about Lloyd Lindsey Young that wasn't connected to KERO. Hopefully, like that better.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

KVMX Old Logo
I think that it looks pretty good. I mean if there were any other logos from the past I would make an entirely new section, but since there is only one, then yea i would keep it where it is. One thing though, and this is just my opinion. I would take off the years on the headings of each little section. They are already in the text. But that is just what i would do.

--Joemama993 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC).

'Ey
You might want to ask for a rename on your old username. -  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Cardmaker ) 08:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

And why By the way, NO--JoeCool950 (talk) 18:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

KIST (AM)
Everything should be all set now. Thanks for the update, I couldn't find the new website so I just went with the last information about the simulcast. I do the best I can from Michigan but can't hear the station. RobDe68 (talk) 20:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

173.81.182.46
The editor calmed down and hasn't re-edited for three days; hopefully they've got the point and they'll move on. If they do it once again, I will ask for a block. But for now the action isn't needed.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That's cool. If you want to, where I've requested the block, mention that, but let's keep an eye on that user, and hopefully they'll know if they make any unnecessary edits, that they'll be blocked.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

User: 99.170.64.248
Are you sure he isn't vandalizing articles? every automotive edit this user has made is definitely constitutes vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.224.246 (talk) 08:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Answer
twitter —Kresblain (talk • contribs) 08:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

e: User:Deconstructhis== I wouldn't call it a problem, just a disagreement. He feels the information isn't needed, I do. But like I said above, due to surgery on Friday and burnout from pervious discussions on the subject (that went on ad naseum on various boards), I don't have the energy to fight on this and am just letting him remove what he calls the "non-notable" former staff. I think a post at WP:TVS is needed to get others opinions on the subject. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 20:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I sent a post to WP:TVS just a second ago to get opinions. Want to see what others say, before I put back what was on there.  If they agree with Deconstructhis, then I will fix up another Bakersfield station.  Just want opinions first. (JoeCool950 (talk) 20:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC))
 * Responding to your message to me - feel free to revert and reftag yourself. The template to use is unreferenced section|date=July 2010 with brackets before and after . Nice to know I'm not alone in this situation. JTRH (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think most of the people on the local TV lists really aren't notable enough to have their own Wikipedia pages. That's usually limited to network news personnel and people with long tenures in major markets (like Roz Abrams in New York). I do want most of them to stay on the list, though. JTRH (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barry Zoeller
A tag has been placed on Barry Zoeller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  elektrik SHOOS  23:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Just a reminder
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Barry Zoeller, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  elektrik SHOOS  23:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please explain this edit. You have seriously prejudiced my willingness to help you. &mdash; RHaworth 00:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not vandalism. You mentioned that I forgot the (coord). I don't think there's nothing wrong with fixing what I forgot.  If what you mentioned explains the same thing, then sorry I corrected it.  I didn't think that there was anything wrong fixing what I forgot to put in there.  You know what, you need to stop being so extremely rude about stuff dude.  I'm here to fix stuff up, and you're making me wish I never was on wikipedia and feel dumb, but "I GUESS I AM DUMB AND STUPID!"

I cannot say I understand your explanation but I will accept it as an apology. Please explain why you think I have been rude. &mdash; RHaworth 02:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Just with some (not all, just some) of the comments that have been left on the article pages, that's all. (JoeCool950 (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC))

If you are trying to complain about one of my edit summaries, please say so explicitly and provide a link to it. &mdash; RHaworth 06:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * It's just on this edit. I don't think you meant for it to be rude, but just so you know.  What the summary says sounds rude to the person who was trying to help.  Just wanted to point that out.  Now, if you didn't mean that summary to be rude, then that's cool.  Hopefully, that helps, so that you know. (JoeCool950 (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC))


 * Does (coord missing|Kern County, California) mean it needs a (coord)? I just noticed the coord on top.  I won't remove it now, that I see what it's for.  How do you get the coord for each school? (JoeCool950 (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC))

I am unavailable
I am on-and-off on Wikipedia and am not available to help with disputes right now. Please consider asking other editors for their third opinion. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  18:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSMJ logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:KSMJ logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSMJ logo2.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:KSMJ logo2.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Really Late RE: KDFO
I'm very sorry for the very long delay. I've been REALLY busy and really have not been on Wikipedia for a long time. In regards to KDFO. I like where the logos are. KVMX, I'm not to sure about. The Kiss-FM logo and KBKO are great, but I think maybe you could move one of the logos to the other side of the article. I don't know I kinda like when the logos are spread around the page. One example is WDTW-FM. There are quite a bit of them scattered around the page and it looks pretty good. And again, sorry for the delay. Thanks! (Joemama993 (talk) 18:30, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:KERN-AM.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KERN-AM.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

My Talk Page Comment; Notes
I thank you for reminding me about the change. I am currently committed to expanding selected articles to the best of my knowledge. CHAK 001 10:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CHAK 001 (talk • contribs)

Christmas Card


Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)





Orphaned non-free image File:Spirit 889 logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Spirit 889 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spirit 889 logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Spirit 889 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 07:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * What this needs is to be in use somewhere in the article space. We can't keep copyrighted work around that we are not actively using. Courcelles 07:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:KHITS-FM logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:KHITS-FM logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:KAVL logo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KAVL logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 08:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KVMX.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:KVMX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KVMX


Concerning your contribution, KVMX, a page move cannot be done by simply copying and pasting the contents of a page into a new location, as such a process does not transfer the page's edit history and therefore violates the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license. As a violation of the page move process, KVMX needs to be temporarily deleted under the speedy deletion criteria so that may be properly moved in a way that will preserve its edit history. KVMX has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If not, please refrain from editing either or KVMX until the latter has been deleted according to Wikipedia's speedy criterion G6 (non-controversial housekeeping).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Problems with upload of File:KPSL-FM.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KPSL-FM.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

RE: Question
As far as I know, links to station bios via station websites can qualify as cited references that validate the information on the page/section. There are station articles that use direct bio links (the only ones I know about are for stations in Columbus, Georgia and Omaha, Nebraska, see KETV, WOWT, WTVM and WRBL). However for ease of use, it might be best just to use the main bios page as a reference on the header of the news team section instead of adding direct links to each name (though adding a link on a name is appropriate if Wikipedia page exists concerning a particular personality, with proper citations on it), as television stations sometimes might not have a prepared individual biography link for a person who has recently joined a station on their bio page, so using a page linking to bios of all the station personalities is best. TVtonightOKC (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSMJ Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:KSMJ Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KBFX ThisTV.png
Thanks for uploading File:KBFX ThisTV.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File:KSMJ logo3.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KSMJ logo3.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)