User talk:JoeFanClub

Joe Sismondo
The article Joe Sismondo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. However, whether you choose to take that advice or not, please don't keep creating articles without providing references to significant independent reliable sources that demonstrate that the subject of the articles satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Also, in my experience whenever someone uses the word "upcoming", it means "not yet notable, but I think he or she will be one day". We don't accept articles on the basis that someone thinks their subject will become notable if they aren't yet. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)