User talk:JoeGoodrich

Can you turn Joe goodrich back on. I have never violated any rules since I have been a member.

JoeGoodrich Dispute overview I tried to start another page. I copied the content from my first page, only for the formatting. I was in the process of changing the content when both pages were deleted. I have asked that JoeGoodrich be turned back on, as I have never had an issue. There is no communication, and the process is unfair. Users involved JoeGoodrich, Resolving the dispute Other steps if any, you have tried to resolve this dispute RHaworth does not communicate, and should not be an administrator. a warning, ask for explanation, anything other than Deleting and not communicating. How you think we can help resolve the dispute? Turn JoeGoodrich back on. Reprimand the admin. RHaworth

JoeGoodrich Dispute overview I tried to start another page. I copied the content from my first page, only for the formatting. I was in the process of changing the content when both pages were deleted. I have asked that JoeGoodrich be turned back on, as I have never had an issue. There is no communication, and the process is unfair. Users involved JoeGoodrich, Resolving the dispute Other steps if any, you have tried to resolve this dispute RHaworth does not communicate, and should not be an administrator. a warning, ask for explanation, anything other than Deleting and not communicating. How you think we can help resolve the dispute? Turn JoeGoodrich back on. Reprimand the admin. RHaworth

Block
Joe Goodrich is not promoting my business. it is about me. I have always followed the rules. I will edit the page to make sure that is follows the guidelines. If you have suggestions, I will do that, but to block me completely, for one mistake is unfair.

I see this on your page. "Playing the ukulele with my newgrass band at Rebecca Giddens' brewpub in Kernville, CA" is that promoting you?

Clear Discrimination
I have been patient here. I have reviewed the Admin personal pages. This is clearly discrimination. This is a direct violation. If my IP is not released immediately, I will have no choice but to take further action. I have no trouble with a warning and an opportunity to correct, however, I will not stand for this. This is no a threat, It is a notice of intent to pursue this site, and its admin in every legal recourse at my disposal, until the situation is resolved. &mdash; Joe Goodrich
 * You have just reinforced the justification for your block by violating our no legal threats rule. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

No I haven't. I clearly states that I must exhaust other means of resolving the issue. I have. In my statement, I clearly wrote "this is not a threat". I have tried to resolve this amicably. I will not be singled out unfairly. I also gave opportunity for you to do the same. You seem to think that one line quips and unfair treatment is exceptable, and that I will either take it or leave it. Im just making it clear that I will use every resource to help me in that endeavor. Turns out the Wikimedia Foundation may not be liable for the content, but is directly responsible for your actions. If you don't get that, you will soon. A Subpoena duces tecum usually gets peoples attention, and opens doors normally left closed. Bottom line, You cant discriminate, even on an open forum. I know all this is falling on deaf ears, so I will let you get back to what you do. I will take it from here! Thanks. Joe


 * Not deaf ears. No comment. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)