User talk:JoeJonas 1233

May 2024
Hello, I'm MaybeitsMir. I noticed that you recently removed content from David Van without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. miranda 3 05:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Van. GraziePrego (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (David Van) for a period of 6 months for content removal without explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Joyous! Noise! 23:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #88396
is closed.. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/JoeJonas 1233. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)