User talk:JoeRoganRules

January 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you recently removed content from Daniel Ek without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 00:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Its misinformation thats been posted!! Joe Rogan has not spread any misinformation JoeRoganRules (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Daniel Ek. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. ɯ ɐ ɔ 💬 00:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Daniel Elk, you may be blocked from editing. ɯ ɐ ɔ 💬 00:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

No. Its derogatory JoeRoganRules (talk) 00:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Take the bullshit lies down then JoeRoganRules (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)