User talk:Joe Chick

Image copyright problem with Image:Richard_huzzey1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Richard_huzzey1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Henley by-election, 2008
I'm confused. Your rewording of the campaign section removed a bunch of cited links over the negative campaigning of both sides. That's not so bad; but your edits read like the Conservatives went negative first; which did not happen. You also removed the section about the LibDem leaflet which insinuated that Boris backed the Lib Dem candidate. Could you explain your edits? --Blowdart | talk 10:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also your "conclusion" is "original research". "

''Some analysts believe that the nature of the campaign may account for the low turnout. Others argue that turnout always drops in by-elections so no conclusions can be drawn from this.'' - the citation you used, one I had added, said no such thing. --Blowdart | talk 10:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Friary Green.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Friary Green.jpg, which you've attributed to Mike Tilbury. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Friary Bowling Club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friary Bowling Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Friary Bowling Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Just Chilling (talk) 22:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)