User talk:Joe Dzhugashvili

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leon Trotsky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. You are welcome to contribute constructively to this neutrally written encyclopedia, but your "icepick target" caption was completely unacceptable. You will be blocked if you try something like that again. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  23:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Leon Trotsky
I completely forgot about that. I'm surprised it wasn't reverted sooner though. However, it's not necessarily wrong as an Icepick was what eventually killed him. So perhaps it could be a nickname. "Thinky Face" ^Don't take me as rude, just a joke. Joe Dzhugashvili (talk) 23:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You are wrong twice. Trotsky was assassinated with a mountaineer's ice axe, not an ice pick. I have seen a photo of the murder weapon, and because I am a climber, I own several of them. You are also wrong if you think that you are allowed to joke around in Wikipedia articles. You aren't, and will be blocked if you persist. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay, my apologies, but there is no need to be rude over it. Also, to block me over one incident that happened over a month ago? That is a little too far; however, that is my personal appearance. Also, I never claimed whether or not I was right or wrong in regards to this edit of Leon Trotsky's page. Also, thank you for the clarification of Trotsky's murder weapon, but perhaps try to be less rude in your responses to people especially if they do not intend to be rude to you (which I for one am not).
 * I am not being rude. I am being businesslike. I did not threaten to block you for your Trotsky edits, although I consider that to be a childish stunt. I stated that you would be blocked if that behavior continued. And I see below that another editor is warning you for disruption. I said above that you are welcome to edit here neutrally, in compliance with our policies and guidelines. And I meant that sincerely. All perspectives are welcome on Wikipedia. But play by the rules. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay, well then I apologise then.

November 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Wait. Why am I already receiving this after only one incident that happened a month ago? Please do not take my words as rude, and please do not block me.
 * There are multiple problems. This diff Special:Diff/808144945 has a deliberately misleading edit summary.  Your addition of File:Adolf Hitler.jpg at Chancellor of Germany‎ was also not reasonable editorially, and your upload appears to be a violation of Commons rules. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 04:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

I would actually like to remove that picture of Hitler, as I realize my mistake with that. Also, thank you for the explanation.

Joseph Stalin
Do not lie in edit summaries. You are on the brink of being blocked. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Hitler photo
So, you are telling us that Hitler posed for a photo in 2017 and Google is the human photographer? What the heck? Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC) I do not know who the photographer was, and I would actually like to remove it. (At least as soon as I can figure out how to work this thing properly). I am deeply sorry for my current stupidity at the moment.
 * The photo will be removed in a week or less. Don't worry about that. Start contributing positively right now, avoid this kind of thing going forward, and learn how we do things here. You can possibly become a useful contributor to this encyclopedia. You have underrepresented interests. We need better biographic coverage of Stalinist political figures and political theories. But you must accept the fact that you will not be allowed to goof off. You will need to collaborate with people you may disagree with completely on almost everything except building an encyclopedia that is one of the world's top websites. Are you up for that challenge? Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it `
 * I'll suggest the other option. Retire User:Joe Dzhugashvili‎, follow the steps at WP:Clean start, and edit pages on any topic other than Stalinists for the next 6 months. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 05:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * In all honesty, I'll perhaps remain on Wikiquotes or continue editing the CPUSA page as I can find sources much easier than that. Perhaps I'll add Grover Furr's discoveries of Trotsky's Nazi Collaboration.
 * As you probably know, Grover Furr holds a PhD in medieval literature, not Russian/Soviet history and is an extreme outlier among authors writing about Stalin and Trotsky. Adding material about his opinions to Leon Trotsky would stir up a hornet's nest and would probably result in you being blocked, given the number of warnings you have already received, including for previous vandalism of the same article. Instead, I suggest that you take on this task: In your sandbox, draft a well-referenced neutrally written paragraph summarizing what Furr has written about Trotsky, followed by a similarly neutral and referenced paragraph describing how Furr's critics evaluate his criticism of Trotsky. Ask me to review your work, and if it is truly neutrally written, it can be added to Grover Furr's biography. This is how we go about writing acceptable encyclopedic content. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  01:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I wasn't actually going to do it, just was saying it. I'm mostly going to stick to quotes. Have a nice day.

November 2017
Hello, Joe Dzhugashvili, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. IP editors are making edits to Communist Party USA quite similar to your recent edits. I have semi-protected that article to stop disruption. Please stop. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  03:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I assure you I do not have any other accounts and am not connected with any of these other people editing CPUSA.

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Green Party of the United States. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 11:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I was unaware that my edit of that page was distruptive/unconstructive. Are you aware that the source given for the Green Party's anti-capitalism contradicts itself?
 * That may be, but there have been discussions about the ideology-section in the past and i recommend not changing anything without gaining concensus on the talk-page. It is also generally accepted that what the Green Party really wants is a form of market socialism. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 09:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, they want market socialism as much as they want leninism or marxism. Nonetheless, I understand what you're saying. Have a nice day.