User talk:Joe Gazz84/Archive/2010/August

Pending revisions
Please do not accept revisions such as this. By insinuating he isn't something, you actually promote that he may be something; per WP:BLP. Thanks for reading - Tommy! [ message ] 23:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Serious?
This was nowhere near ready to be moved into mainspace. The references aren't formatted correctly per this, and should in fact probably use citeweb. Ignoring that, the content is also lacking and needs a little expanding, perhaps in infobox. At the moment it is an article in very poor shape despite being reasonably well sourced. Please be careful to review thoroughly before accepting and declining articles. Thank you, sonia  ♫  23:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/No Other Name
I am handling this one by email, please leave it for me to review. Sorry that I didn't mark it as so earlier. Cheers, sonia  ♫  23:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I am leaving it for your review I just marked it so others did not take it. Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 23:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. If you ever need any help with anything, do feel free to ask or email. sonia  ♫  01:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Peter Mountford
Hello Joe: Checking in on the Mountford page, to see if I did anything wrong, and that's why it was flagged. Or should I just wait to resubmit it when his book's come out next spring and/or he's published other things? Arnecfi (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I will check into it. I will let you know.

Updated Reference Formatting page: sbandit/ScottKurland
Joe, thank you for your comments regarding my page submission. I have since updated the reference formatting per the guidelines on wikipedia, with the appropriate inline html references using the formatting method.

Please let me know if any other changes are required in order to have the page moved.

Regards, Sbandit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbandit (talk • contribs) 01:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Images for upload pages.

A few tips that you might find helpful:
 * Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
 * The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.

Once again, welcome to the project. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
 * You might wish to add AFC status to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
 * Several of our members monitor an IRC channel,, and you are most welcome to join in.

Thanks from the GOCE
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Diannaa at 20:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC).

New York Jets (GA Nomination)
I checked over the article and I believe I have corrected the issue concerning the WikiLinks.The Writer 2.0 Talk 19:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request declined
Hi Joe, I have declined your speedy deletion request for 203d RED HORSE Squadron. The article has a few sentences of prose, so it is not eligible for A3. Feel free to PROD it or nominate it at AfD. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

GA reviews
Hey Joe, thanks for your recent GA reviews. One quick suggestion - when passing an article, could you also add the appropriate category to the "|topic=" parameter in the GA template? This helps to organize GA articles. Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)