User talk:Joe Hearald

May 2010
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. ... disco spinster   talk  23:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Patrice Lumumba has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. AmioDarone (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive contributions to Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to Culture of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This edit appeared to be vandalism, and has been automatically reverted by DASHBot.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:
 * Click here to submit a false positive report.
 * [ Edit this page] and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 02:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

re Patrice Lumumba
Here, you claimed that the reference (a NY Times article) indicated "The CIA was involved because they captured him and took him there". But the reference says nothing of the sort, and does not mention the CIA.

I had to take time out from my other duties to check this, and I'm annoyed that I had to do that and that it didn't check out. I don't know if the CIA was involved in Lumumba's assassination or not, but if you think so, please provide your own references and not falsely characterize existing references.

Thanking you for wasting my time (not), Herostratus (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yamaha XV535, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Philip Trueman (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gaiking, you may be blocked from editing. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk |Sign 15:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text to this page. Kuru  (talk)  15:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)