User talk:Joe Heato

Psychokinesis
Hi. I just wanted to clarify why I reverted your edit at Psychokinesis. I don't believe it is necessary to say that "Most scientists maintain that no convincing evidence exists" rather than "there is no convincing evidence that psychokinesis is a real phenomenon". I would suggest that almost all scientists would agree that there is no convincing evidence for the phenomenon. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 21:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I don't disagree with enforcing the skeptical perspective on wikipedia (see my edit to telepathy), but it seemed to me that some edits reflected the sources in a biased manner not justified by the original surce (e.g., the rendition of the AIR report in the Stargate project).Joe Heato (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)