User talk:Joe Sewell/Archives/Archive-Jan2011

you mite like
the main page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob1318 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

The Lodger
See this discussion about even the interpretation of the Doctors during that scene. Because there's no significance (yet!) of that single shot, we can't establish who it may be, and the way that is written is that it perhaps is another incarnation of the Doctor, which we can't verify.

Now, there was something comparable that being from "Flesh and Stone" (prior to the airing of the Big Bang), in that there's that scene with the Doctor with jacket and different watch talking to the blinded Amy. Prior to the Big Bang, without sources, we couldn't talk about that difference at all as that original research/speculation. Fortunately, a few reliable sources noted that difference and commented about it believing it important, allowing us to include it. When The Big Bang rolled around, then all the answers were cleared up. Now, if we didn't have those sources, we could still talk about that scene in Flesh and Stone after the Big Bang as it was obvious continuity.

Right now, that one unnamed person in the montage is simply a shot with no obvious relevance. Without any source commenting on it, we shouldn't mention it. But if there does exist a reliable source that mentions "Heeeey, who's this guy?" then we can include it without worry of original research. Or, comparatively, if the identity is shown in Series 6 (or later) who that is within the story, then we can go back and add it to the Lodger's article. --M ASEM (t) 20:59, 14 January 2011 (UTC)