User talk:Joe hill

Spam links
The probable reason you do not see these links when you log in is because the vandalism was already reverted but resides in your web browsers cache. When you log in, it resets or uses a different area of that cache that does not show the vandalism. If you force the page to reload, it will not appear. —Centrx→talk &bull; 04:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -Andrew c [talk] 17:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Stop edit warring immediately and discuss on the talk page. Zim Zala Bim  talk  20:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I moved the comments you made at Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 20 to the actual talk page for the article. Please don't add comments in the archive. Further, you continue to engage in an edit war without. Once more, and you'll be blocked. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  20:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry! My intention was not to engage in edit war. I just think that the article needs minor changes to better reflect the actual situation and to give a more balancedl and professional impression. --Joe hill (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nagoya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)