User talk:Joedini123

Welcome!
Hello, Joedini123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

The Walking Dead
I reverted your systematic additions of Idiotbox reviews to The Walking Dead articles because this does not appear to be a reliable source. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding this blog site to articles. Your edits are being reverted by users other than just myself. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Regarding this edit, I'm sorry, but I do not feel the need to send a lengthy explanation about why idiotbox is an unreliable source. I responded kindly to your initial email, and received two others that I do not intend to respond to. You are systematically adding an unreliable source to Wikipedia articles. Clearly, others feel the same way as I do. (And no offense to Drovethrughosts -- I respect this individual's contributions to Wikipedia greatly -- but I do not know this person and please do not think that I went out of my way to recruit a "buddy" to also revert your edits.) -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

To clarify on this, that right there is the issue. "I responded kindly to your initial email" is not even close to how that email came across. It came across as patronising when all I was after was a little bit of help. That may have been unintentional, but a further email asking you the best way to proceed was ignored. So yes, we have continued to "undo the undo's" when if you had just helped and clarified things clearer to begin with that would have been that.

March 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Soetermans. T / C 14:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Blocked
I have blocked you for three days for edit-warring to insert reviews from Idiotbox, in an apparent attempt to promote that website. If this continues after the block expires, you will be permanently blocked. To appeal, place beneath this message. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)