User talk:Joejoe399

I have no problem with the school or the rules. If that's the environment that they want to create, then so be it. I only seek to give those curious about the school, its rules, and what it stands for the information they need. It wasn't easy to find the Enlightener on the website and none of the major rules are mentioned anywhere on the website that I could find. If you don't like the particular tone of the way of some rules are presented, then change it. If you spend more than two seconds reading the Enlightener, you will find much of the language used was copied directly from the Enlightener. I think this is why your only solution thus far has been to blank the entire section- as if these strict rules wouldn't be even remotely relevant to someone considering spending thousands of dollars to send their child to this institution.

Furthermore, the admissions page is just that- a webpage. The actual contract that you sign and that both sides agree to abide by is the Enlightener- not the admissions page. If there is a contradiction, then the Enlightener wins out over the admissions page.

You should keep the "neutral point of view" rule in mind as well.
I think it is important you understand the "neutral point of view" doctrine. Wikipedia is not a mouthpiece for North Greenville University. It should not read like a commercial for the institution. Negative, but true, information is allowed on Wikipedia. If you want an advertisement for NGU go to their webpage. If you want the truth about the school, you should be able to go to Wikipedia. All of the rules are backed up by citations. I'm sorry if you'd rather the North Greenville Wikipedia page read like an informercial for North Greenville, but I don't think that's what the founders of Wikipedia had in mind when they created this website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.140.170 (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)