User talk:Joellegavazziapril

Welcome!
Hello, Joellegavazziapril, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Joëlle's Peer Review
Reviewing 'Bio-fuel in Canada'

If I understand correctly, your work is only about the Bio-Energy section and not the whole 'Renewable Energy in Canada' wiki page.

1. The lead section is easy to understand and explains the concept clearly so that the average person can easily understand what are the bio-fuel in Canada. 2. As for the structure, ideas are well divided in different paragraphs which makes it easier to read. Putting subheadings would make it even better, since there are a lot of information to cover on this subject (and more information will probably be added in the future). So if someone would only want to know about specific information on the subject, it would be easier for them to find it. For example, in the first paragraph, it explains that wood is the most commonly employed biomass. More information could be added on wood and it could also be on a separate paragraph (with possibly a subheading). Great table at the end of the paragraph (I will have to add a table to my own article, I find that it gives information really clear). 3. As I already mentioned, I would add more information about wood and maybe the second most commonly employed biomass in Canada. In the second paragraph, I would add details about the fortunate position that Canada is in. Examples: which biomass products are available in abundance + explanation, what other benefits (other than new jobs) has the growing industry provided to the country, etc. 4. The content is neutral. 5. Good sources that are not outdated. Also the sources either come from official websites such as Statistic Canada or peer reviewed work. Information could be cited more often.

Overall really good, I would just be more precise and clear by adding details and cite information more. I would also maybe add information about bio-fuel in the lead, to introduce that there will be information about bio-fuel in Canada further down.

I think that the information is put in an order that makes sense.