User talk:Joelmull

Speedy deletion of Bow/Stern thruster
A tag has been placed on Bow/Stern thruster, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I've noted the "hangon" tag you placed on the above-noted article. If you refer to the Wikipedia policy at this link, on original research, and read it in conjunction with the first line of the article, "This article is based upon personal experiences and observation," you'll understand why the article is unlikely to be allowed to remain.  Wikipedia articles have to be based on reliable sources, which are defined in the article accessed by the link in this sentence.  If you have any questions about Wikipedia policy, feel free to leave me a note.  Accounting4Taste: talk 20:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Echoing Accounting4Taste's comment - While I acknowledge that you likely know what you're talking about, all articles must adhere to policies on verifiability. This typically means that everything is drawn from an independent, published reliable source, and that articles cannot contain original research or unsourced material. While again, it's likely that the material here is accurate, there is no way to verify that that is the case, which is why the tag was applied requesting its deletion. Is it possible that, based on your experience, there are sources that could confirm some of this material? UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 20:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bow/Stern thruster has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  20:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)