User talk:Joelschneier

The criteria for an article to be removed for speedy deletion because it is "unremarkable", which is quoted as "An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject" is, I believe, in direct conflict with the values of Wikipedia. How can the importance of an "unremarkable" article be evaluated if it is deleted within minutes of its launch? Wikipedia is a collaborative, interactive project and as such an article should not be deemed "unremarkable" unless there are no additional edits (not including deletion of course) within a certain time period (say a week). If no one cares to improve on the article then it is surely "unremarkable." After all, there are countless articles on Wikipedia about bands, companies, web content, or people that could very well be considered "unremarkable" if not for the fact that several users have chosen to take the time to improve on the article itself and to make it seem relevant to the rest of the Wikipedia universe. Time is of the essence, and an article that is suspect of being "unremarkable" needs a fair amount of time in order to fairly judge its importance.

Furthermore, the article for NinjaPanckakes.com cannot be considered advertising because NinjaPancakes.com has no money-making motives. There are no ads for any merchandise or other products on the website.


 * The criteria are explained at Speedy deletion, WP:Notability, WP:COI and WP:REF. Also, there is a good article at secondary sources. There is nothing personal in all of this, it is that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a bulletin board. We get thousands of people creating articles about their companies, websites, girlfriends, baseball teams, pets, etc. every day. We encourage people to create articles on notable subjects, and to be "notable" means someone else must have noticed and published something else about the subject in a book or mainstream media article. --Fire Star 火星 14:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Ninjapancakes.com
A tag has been placed on Ninjapancakes.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Ninjapancakes.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. StoptheDatabaseState 21:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ninjapancakes.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Ninjapancakes.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks.

Please do not create the article again until it meets the notability criteria at WP:WEB. Thanks. ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 03:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Recreation of Ninjapancakes.com
Please stop recreating this article. If you feel it was incorrectly deleted and meets the requirements described here then please submit the article to deletion review. Pascal.Tesson 03:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Last warning
If you add the abovementioned page to Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Fire Star 火星 03:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Moulthrop2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Moulthrop2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)