User talk:Joemama29

January 2016
Hello, I'm Caballero1967. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Smith (explorer) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Caballero / Historiador ⎌  17:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meyers Leonard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  17:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Smith, you may be blocked from editing. For the second time in this article. Please, cease. Caballero / Historiador ⎌  18:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bo Dallas. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bo Dallas was changed by Joemama29 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914243 on 2016-01-26T17:21:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)