User talk:Joeperez69

Welcome!

Hello, Joeperez69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! &mdash; goethean &#2384; 15:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Integral movement has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://integral-options.blogspot.com/ (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

hello
. ok Thinsk your asing for your own sand box to edit in private right??? here you go User:Joeperez69/sandbox1..User:Joeperez69/sandbox2...have fun
 * No if you mean a Portal i can help more ...Buzzzsherman (talk) 03:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Link format
I'm glad you appreciate the Steiner and Anthroposophy pages. They were the result of a long process; patience is always a virtue!

Incidentally, when you link to Wikipedia pages, you can just use one of the formats you'll see in this comment (e.g. Ken Wilbur ) rather than going through a hyperlink. hgilbert (talk) 14:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 01:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

List of Integral thinkers
Hi Joe. Re List of integral thinkers and supporters, it's redundant to cite Wikipedia pages in the footnotes, as the pages are linked to anyway in the main text by the double angle brackets. The footnotes are for non-Wikipedia sources (following notability guidelines). I meant to mention it before. Cheers M Alan Kazlev (talk) 02:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Goethean
You may wish to make a comment at this page. Durova 412 05:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * Reviewing administrator, please see Sockpuppet_investigations/Joeperez69/Archive. It's not merely the technical connection between Joeperez69, but also its first edit arising in extremely short time frame (23 minutes) after an administrator tagged the biography.  Joe Perez's appeal seriously understates the conflict of interest, which is "establishing integral studies as more widely accepted in academia" via paid advocacy in Wikipedia articles.  User was also blocked for block evasion since previous appeal.  I might have been persuaded if this editor's appeal had demonstrated understanding of WP:MEAT and WP:PROMOTION and had pledged to refrain from repeating past problems.  But really, he doesn't see anything wrong with using students as unwitting vehicles to insinuate a topic into the academic mainstream.  That goes against site mission on a fundamental level.  Durova  412 04:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Joeperez69/Integral studies
User:Joeperez69/Integral studies, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joeperez69/Integral studies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Joeperez69/Integral studies during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ RobTalk 05:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of integral thinkers and supporters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of integral thinkers and supporters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of integral thinkers and supporters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)