User talk:Joepeter

Speedy deletion of Joe Wilkinson
A tag has been placed on Joe Wilkinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Acroterion  (talk)  22:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 12:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Andrew scarlett
A tag has been placed on Andrew scarlett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gwernol 17:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 18:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You are adding you addition into an existing reference, which breaks the reference. Please note that since your addition is itself unsourced, it violates our policy on biographies of living people. Please do not add this back to the article without an extremely good source to accompany it. Thanks, Gwernol 18:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Jonny Wilkinson
Hi

You have twice added Jonny's Lion caps to his English total. The two are kept separate on his record, that is why he is currently listed as 68, not 73. Can you please leave it in this format? Thanks, KingStrato (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)