User talk:Joepoe100

The Suite Life On Water
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Suite Life On Water, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of The Suite Life On Water. J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Suite Life On Water
An editor has nominated The Suite Life On Water, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jennifer tisdale 1178295233.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jennifer tisdale 1178295233.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. —TreasuryTag —t —c 17:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of SoopaKule TV
A tag has been placed on SoopaKule TV, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Speedy deletion of V. J. Patterson
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Sexy Sea  Shark  16:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ... disco spinster   talk  16:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 11:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Jonas
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalism of a biography of living persons. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gimmetrow 21:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Lilo & Stitch 3: Twin of Stitch listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lilo &. Since you had some involvement with the Lilo & Stitch 3: Twin of Stitch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –WPA (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)