User talk:Joetherealjow

January 2023
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Rebecca Sugar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thats rud Joetherealjow (talk) 19:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not rude, though the particular message here isn't the full explanation: The issue with your edit was that while Rebecca Sugar is pronoun flexible (they/them as well as she/her is fine), there is consensus (agreement among editors who discussed it) to use she/her right now since Rebecca is okay with both. (Most active editors on that article aren't really against they/them or anything; it's mostly a case of inertia, i.e. "the current consensus isn't problematic and no one has presented a pressing reason to change it that aligns with what we know and with Wikipedia policy".) Consensus can change, but for this it hasn't thus far, and most people who boldly switch the pronouns to they/them against the established consensus aren't usually interested in having a civil and thought-out discussion on the talk page. - Purplewowies (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)