User talk:Joewalbridge/Segmental arterial mediolysis

Arika’s peer review feedback:
 * 1) Everything is very relevant. I found no unnecessary or distracting topics or phrases.
 * 2) The article is neutral, with no evident biases.
 * 3) Viewpoints are also neutral and none are either over- or under-represented.
 * 4) Citations look good thus far. It might be hard to do with this specific topic, but I might see if there is 1-2 sources that are not from medical journals that you can incorporate. That way there’s at least 1 source that’s accessible to the readers regardless of their background/ability to read or not read complicated medical or science articles. Maybe see if a less trustworthy/academic, but more accessible, site like WebMD has something to offer?
 * 5) I might put your citations within the paragraphs themselves versus attached to the headings (e.g. Mechanism or Treatment). I say this only because I haven’t seen other Wiki articles with citations of the headings — it may in fact be totally permissible. Otherwise, the source links work and support your articles claims.
 * 6) In the intro paragraph, I would explain what an aneurysm is - or at least link to the wiki page on aneurysms
 * 7) There are actually lots of different words/phrases that you could link to other relevant wiki pages. I would recommend doing this when possible as it’ll help make the article more “digestible.” For example, you can link to the Tunica Media wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunica_media) when describing the middle layer of the artery in the Mechanism section
 * 8) Overall super nice job! I thought the article was very clear and concise. My major recommendation would be to just like to other wiki pages and otherwise I think you’re pretty darn good to go. Well done.

AEWieneke (talk) 18:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
Okay, so I got ahead of myself with the peer review stuff... so there's a couple different places where I posted peer review comments for you. First, I added a free-form (bullet points) review for you on your talk page. Then, I realized that we are given a peer review form/template that we're supposed to fill out, so I completed that too. So lots of feedback for you! Sorry to make it confusing.

AEWieneke (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)