User talk:JoeyColeman

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- JamesTeterenko 18:57, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Not back
I am not back, I just came on last night to list something that I couldn't stand to not see on afd. I will be here until it's completion, and then leave again. Hopefully for good. -- Spinboy  20:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes, CFS has a tendency to do that. You just gotta stay on top of it. --[[Image:Ottawa flag.png|20px]] Spinboy  00:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit at Talk:The_Inquirer?
That section is completely off-topic and its only purpose is to attack me. Why did you place it back in? Dionyseus 06:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Your blog
As someone formerly involved with student politics, I really enjoyed your blog. Me-123567-Me 15:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

cfs
Hey Joey-kins!!! I missed you man, have you been busy writing in that tabloid rag you call macleans? and "Mr. B"? I'm sorry, but do you think you know something about me? That could also be taken as a threat and that would be very unbecoming of a wikipedian. Nice try.Nocandu1976 (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I love your anonymous nature and your claim that I am somehow "threatening" you. Your jealousy betrays you. JoeyColeman (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Winnipeg
Hello,

Can you clarify why you are reverting my changes to Winnipeg? In my view, the new lead paragraph emphasizes the more important detail, a reference to a distance calculator seems unnecessary per WP:CK, and the year 2014 is no longer in the future. I fail to see how any of this is so uncontroversially incorrect that it demands reversal without explanation. 50.71.237.25 (talk) 01:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)