User talk:JoeyRamoneFan123

September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lars Ulrich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lars Ulrich was changed by JoeyRamoneFan123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925208 on 2018-09-29T20:36:35+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lars Ulrich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 20:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lars Ulrich. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 20:43, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lars Ulrich shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 20:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:45, 29 September 2018 (UTC)