User talk:Joeybabe25

Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:New contributors' help page on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. Tangot a ngo 12:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=561092893 your edit] to Mitt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ==See also==

Recent edits to Mitt
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Technopat (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit to Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller
Hi, Joeybabe25 - The external link you've twice added to the Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller page has been removed both times because 1) it is not from a notable source, and 2) its main subject is not Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller, but rather one of their songs. For those reasons, it is not a suitable link. Please do not add it again. You may wish to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for external links. Thanks. Pstoller (talk) 00:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to I Will Follow Him
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! -- Wywin (talk &#124; contribs) 18:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=611434196 your edit] to Hula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:29, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * * Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iBWlrG7kEc Hula Teacher On What's My Line 8/26/62

Spamming youtube
Please read over WP:SPAMMER. If you have more questions after feel free to talk to me again. --Moxy (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Postove


The article Joe Postove has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Notability: no significant RS coverage can be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)