User talk:Joeycat47

January 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ordoliberalism, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ordoliberalism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 18:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 03:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I didn't mean to be logged out. I am not making a controversial edit, it is clearly misleading to put in the first sentence of Ordoliberalism that Walter Eucken did not advocate for a welfare state. Look at footnote 16, where it says the ordoliberals were open to a welfare state. Eucken did not advocate against a welfare state, and putting that 'he did not advocate for a welfare state" in the first sentence implies he was ambivalent or against a welfare state, which is untrue. Ralf Ptak is the highly controversial one, he has called Eucken a fascist sympathizer to draw attention to himself, even though it is untrue. Joeycat47 (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you don't believe me, you should contact Nils Goldschmidt about whether Ptak is controversial or not. He should not have the lead sentence on ordoliberalism on wikipedia, since he is intentionally misleading imo. Joeycat47 (talk) 03:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Or ask Brigette Young Joeycat47 (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Or Ingo Pies Joeycat47 (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)