User talk:Joeymattii

June 2013
Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jane Censoria Cajes because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Tentinator   08:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Joeymattii. How come you keep removing text from Jane Censoria Cajes‎ and placing an inappropriate picture on there? If you keep edit warring over this you will suffer from the WP:3RR rule that says that you are not allowed to keep reverting over article content. Are you attempting to whitewash| the subject? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Joeymattii, you are invited to the Teahouse
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane Censoria Cajes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 17:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Jane Censoria Cajes. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 17:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jane Censoria Cajes. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 00:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 00:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jane Censoria Cajes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jane Censoria Cajes was changed by Joeymattii (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859133 on 2013-06-12T00:23:20+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring to supress content you do not wish to be seen, in violation of Wikipedia's polciy on neutral point of view. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)