User talk:Joezeff

Tajiks
Please STOP adding ethnic gallery to the infobox at Tajiks. Although this used to be allowed it was changed - MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES states " Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a photomontage or gallery of images of group members" - Arjayay (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Although its futile to even start discussing anything with sockpuppets, this is your final warning for cross-article edit-warring with a WP:SPA agenda, as you're doing constantly. - '' LouisAragon (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Avicenna, you may be blocked from editing. GSS (talk) 15:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 16:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 16:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  16:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)