User talk:Johan O. Johansen

Your submission at AfC John O. Johnson, White Bear Lake (August 20)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions for draft
Check out the top of your draft, I have some suggestions on how to get this over the hump and published (which we are close to but not quite there yet). Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John O. Johnson, White Bear Lake. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, you almost have the footnoting coding right, but not quite. I straightened a bit out for you, so if you can just fix the few remaining ones the footnotes will all be nice and clean. Sorry that it's a little confusing figuring out how to code them right at first, but once you learn it it's really easy, and it's nice and organised and foolproof. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC John O. Johnson was accepted
 John O. Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Article published
Hello, you seemed to be having some trouble figuring out footnoting, so I fixed and cleaned it up for you, added WP:wikilinks, and applied WP:Categories. So now it's a basic article and published. Better footnoting (especially as many whole sentences/paragraphs are unfootnoted) would be better, but we can roll with this for now.

The main next step would be to add photos. The general idea is that we can freely use pre-1923 photos since those are out of copyright, but for any post-1923 photos we must file a WP:OTRS ticket with Wikimedia Foundation indicating that the photos are released under a WP:Creative Commons license. That is, you or whoever is the inheritor of the copyright of the photos would have to file a document with the overall Foundation (not me personally) if you have any intent to use post-1923 photos in the article. But pre-1923 is just fine if you have any of those, you can upload them directly to Wikimedia Commons.

If you have any trouble uploading photos, let me know by posting on my Talk page. And incidentally, I am an actual person and not a robot, so you can respond to my posts here so we can communicate rather than it be all one-way. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)