User talk:Johann320

Graham Hancock
Hi there Johann320. Unfortunately, as apposite as the sentiment in your edit to Graham Hancock's article may be, joke additions such as that aren't really the thing. For what it's worth I at least found it amusing, but have had to revert it in any case. Please restrain from re-inserting it again, persistence in even entertaining edits can be construed as Vandalism, and there could be consequences down the track eg the imposition of a temporary block from editing here under your account or ip address. If you'd like to help put Hancock's work into perspective, I'd invite you to research and input some sourced rebuttals of his fanciful 'theories', observing of course wikipedia's Neutral point of view and verifiability policies. Regards, --cjllw | TALK  03:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Chris Tarrant:
Your recent edit to Chris Tarrant (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 06:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Continuing vandalism January 26 2007
Regarding your edits to Knees Up Mother Brown, Bobby Davro, and Ben Fogle, Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. --Flyguy649 06:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)