User talk:Johann Wolfgang/Archive 4

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Infobox
There is a consensus discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft on adopting a non-specifications summary infobox for aircraft articles. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks! - Emt147 Burninate!  18:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey
How's things? Wanted to make sure you saw these Thnx :)  Joe I  10:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Award
Hey, I've noticed you haven't been really active lately. I hope you're not losing interest in the project. Anyway, I've been meaning to thank you for welcoming me into the community way back in Ocober 2005. If you're busy in the "real world," I wish you good luck. -- Tantalum T  e  lluride ♪ 02:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Rhenania-RH-XX
I see you have created articles on some ships in the swedish navy under the names Rhenania RH-XX, for example the Wachtmeister class that is refered to as Rhenania RH-98. I have not been able to find any other article that refers to these ships by the name Rhenania. What is your source? --Dahlis 12:57, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

HMS Royal Oak
Hi

I am at present engaged in writing a series of definitive articles on British battleships of the Victorian era. You have already written a short article on HMS Royal Oak (1862), which Wiki have classed as a stub. Would you object if I erased your words and did a more extensive article? I will not do so without your approval. --Anthony.bradbury 21:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * HMS Royal Oak page done if you would like to comment.--Anthony.bradbury 19:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Eleventh-century battleships
Hello, Johann Wolfgang!

Thanks for correcting a most embarrassing typo in the HMS Swiftsure (1870) stub. Keep up the good work!

Regards, John Moore 309 16:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Royal Oak
Thank you for your kind comment.--Anthony.bradbury 21:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Esperanza

Happy wiki-Birthday
Hello friend. I wish you a very happy wiki-birthday on 25th June 2006. BTW, I learnt of the same from Esperanza and i am wishing you a day in advance. All the best for the coming year! --Bhadani 14:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Happy first edit day! Kimchi.sg 10:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)



Oh, no! I'm late! Sorry, sir! All the best!-- Tdxi an  g  11:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Maritime warfare task force
Hello, Johann Wolfgang!

Good news: has recently created the  Maritime warfare task force as part of the Military History project. Bad news: so far, it has only three members (the worst news is that one of them is me).

I think this would be a good forum for discussing of maritime warfare/naval history, exchanging ideas and establishing best practice at a more general level than the Ships project. If you are interested, can I suggest you pay a visit and, if you like what you see, sign up?

Regards, John Moore 309 16:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Coaching
Hi Johann Wolfgang. Are you free to coach me? My admin coaches are inactive...if you can, thanks a lot. Do inform me.-- Tdxi an  g  08:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

from Gifford...
Dear Johann,

I left a message on the "Web Portal" talk page for you.

Cheers,

Gifford Watkins

Admin Coaching
Here is where you go to sign up. Thank you so much! I was worried I would be unable to find a coach. I hope we can work together to continue in our quest to develop the Free Encyclopedia. My page is here, so that you can reply if you want to answer my questions. See you soon.-- Tdxi an  g  07:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Numismatics
Just something to keep ya busy! :)    Jo  e  I  21:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Maritime military history
Hello! As I see you have an interest in old naval ships I just wanted to let you know that a Maritime warfare task force has been established under the WikiProject Military history. Why not take a look? :) Inge 11:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much.
I thank you very much Johann. However, due to real-life stress. I am unable to continue with admin coaching. Please forgive me. I am really dead beat and stressed out. It has been nice wokring with people like you, Johann! I hate to go.-- Tdxi an  g  09:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Need your support
As a member of the Project Philately I would like to make you aware of a discussion about the Category:Philatelists that some of us have recently come to a consensus about. The discussion is here, but essentially a decision was made to try and remove all the subcategories that grouped the philatelists into country categories even though there are only just over 20 pages referenced and some of the subcategories had a few as 1 listing. Besides which, I would never go looking for a philatelist based on a country of origin, even if I knew it, I would look at the category for his/her name. Anyway, this is up for discussion now at a CfD, categories for deletion, page and I would appreciate if you would weigh in on the matter having first looked at the original discussion. I am sure you will see the benefit and logic of getting rid of these redundant subcategories and vote a Support for this. By way of reference, one of these subcategories was up for deletion a short time ago and basically all the non-philately people won the day, overriding the philatelic viewpoint. I am sure you would not want that to happen again. Do not delay as CfDs get dealt with fairly quickly. TIA ww2censor 20:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

German unit
You wrote "I don't see anything wrong with that. I will help you if you want.". I'm not sure which "that" you were talking about. Is it Anyway, I am going to carry that on in a day or two. I know that the assessment thing is going on. But I would also like to make the German unit transition as quickly as possible. I will also notify Dove1950 and Nightstallion, for they care about the naming convention too. --Chochopk 09:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) The current status
 * 2) Changing them to upper case


 * Discussion going on Talk:German mark. --Chochopk 15:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Admin coaching
I've now formally assigned you to coach Tdxiang, as was requested. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for helping out :) Petros471 15:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Antarctican dollar AfD
Sorry to spam if you are already aware. But I had to resort to personal message. Someone is trying to delete Antarctican dollar, I tried really hard to make a point at Articles for deletion/Antarctican dollar. Now I need people to support the "keep" side. Thanks. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 05:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Carter Glass
You are right. In the 1964 edition of the World Book Encyclopedia, the "M" volumn under Money, Page 594, there is a chart listing U.S. currencies. Second from the bottom of the chart lists: Denomination     Front Portrait    Back Embellishment 50,000.............Glass...........A Spread Eagle

I don't doubt this chart appears in many other editions of the World Book.

hsftennis@cfl.rr.com

P.S. This is my first visit to Wikipedia. I hope I did it right.

suicide of ex PCOG member
On a forum of sorts is an entry by "Searchme" aka "Joe I" (I think) where he makes reference to the suicide of one John Briggs.

I am part of an organization that monitors and counsels people out of that cult, and really need to get more details on this, but have not been able to. I was also unable to find a way to contact this "Searchme" person, but your name is listed on his bio page. Would you please contact him and have him get in touch with me.

Bill Hohmann

wmhohmann@peoplepc.com Exit and Support Network

Thanks

Esperanza Admin coaching - October 29 - Pending
You are receiving this message because you are currently listed as a coach in the 'Pending' section of the coaching box.


 * If the coaching has started and is ongoing please move the entry to the 'active' section of the box'.
 * If the coaching has finished/never going to start please add your trainee to the archived requests section of the archive, and remove the entry from the coaching box.
 * You can fill in information about your former students, at the main archive.
 * If the coaching is ongoing please continue :) This might serve as a useful reminder to check with your trainee if they have any new questions!
 * If you are ready to be assigned a new trainee, or have any other questions, please let me know on my talk page.

Thank you for helping with admin coaching! H ig hway Grammar Enforcer!  22:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

November Esperanza Newsletter
This is an archive, please to not modify it, thank you.