User talk:John20003

November 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, LaSexta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Aranya (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Eldiario.es. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Aranya (talk) 13:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LaSexta, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LaSexta. CLCStudent (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at LaSexta shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to expand on the above - please read through the links above about edit warring. When another editor reverts your changes, you are expected to discuss it on the article's talk page, rather than repeatedly reinstate your change. If you reinstate your changes again when you are unblocked, without first discussing the changes with other editors, you are likely to be blocked again for a longer period. Read through the links and familiarise yourself with the collaborative environment we try to maintain; I'd also advise you to find some reliable sources to support the assertions you are trying to add, if you hope to gain a consensus for the changes. Girth Summit  (blether)  13:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)