User talk:John223

Welcome
Best regards, Midorihana ~いいですね? はい! 08:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Runecats Explorer
A tag has been placed on Runecats Explorer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Runecats Explorer


The article Runecats Explorer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability at all

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SkyBonTalk/Contributions 16:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Runecats Explorer
I seemed to have misplaced my password, so i have created a new account, Runecats Explorer is a highly popular web browser just like Google chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari... Avant, Flock and many more. Runecats Explorer has been on wikipedia for a long time and has been edited by many people, the article has grown from the basic level which I created.

Runecats Explorer is a browser which was first available to the public in 2005, It has been going for a long time and has indeed become very popular, The browser is quite popular in the UK and the USA, I am unaware if it is as widely used where SkyBon comes from.

I merely created the article, but people have managed to maintain it which shows a good public interest in the subject, at my previous work place Runecats Explorer was the standard internet browser on all of the nodes in the building as they found it to be stable and quite reliable (As it was a researching company)

I find it hard to understand that this browser is not notable but many of the browsers on that list are, Runecats Explorer is often talked in conversations about browsers.

Runecats Explorer is the first browser to make a browser to attempt to save electricity (I only found out this today) and they also have used so very interesting and new technologies into there interfaces which i believe certain gives it the edge.

I hope this helps, sorry i haven't been able to contribute more but as I stated above I have misplaced my password, I will use this account from now on.

If you need any more information I will attempt to supply you with it, but many some of the other contributors of this section may no more.

Kind Regards, John —Preceding unsigned comment added by John2232 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I am from Russia. Any statistics about usage or reviews? If yes then demonstrate it here so that there were no questions about notability. Otherwise WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS per cases with Dooble and Arora (web browser). SkyBonTalk/Contributions 11:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Hiya Skybon, Could you give me a bit of time to do some research, I am currently very busy but I will find some time to do some research. I understand that you are from Russia and Runecats Explorer may not be as widely used where you come from.

The Runecats Explorer user-agent changes every version which makes it quite hard to track as they usually have around two new versions a year. A typical user agent for the newest Runecats Explorer (1.6) Pro would look like this: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; Runecats Explorer Pro; .NET CLR 2.0.51627) Unfortunately another draw back of a user agent like this is that it often gets logged as Internet Explorer rather than it's own separate browser on market share websites.

If you could give me some time to obtain some usage information, I would be greatful (as I have said I am not an expert just a user, I may try and contact some of the other users to see if they have an information to save me time.)

Kind Regards John2232 (talk) 12:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

You happen to be the first person who has questioned it's notability and thats why I don't have the information already, I presumed everyone knew about RE.

I have work colleges who live in Sweden, New Zealand and Latvia who also have heard of Runecats Explorer.

Yet again if you could give me a fair about of time to do research, as I do have work to do as well.

Kind Regards, John2232 (talk) 12:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you don't have to do any research. It'll be enough to provide some links to reviews at notable sites (not like Softpedia, it is a DL site). As for now I assume that RE notability is equal or close to 0. Hope this will change by the beginning of next week (AfD discussions usually last 7 days). SkyBonTalk/Contributions 12:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Well as the article has been running for over a year now, and has had tons of edits, I am pretty certain it's notability is quite high, we will see what happens with the AfD, also what would you classify as a reliable review site?

Kind Regards, John2232 (talk) 14:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)