User talk:John5962

Justmeonhere (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries and sources
Hello, John5962. Your change to content at Aleria was correct, but please make use of the WP:edit summary facility and provide a reliable source for any changes you make. I've found and added a source to confirm the accuracy of your change; best if you do this yourself; unexplained changes, coupled with the lack of sources to verify them can lead to automatic, justified reversion by page-watchers and bots; and wasted effort on your part. Best, Haploidavey (talk) 22:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Removing cited sources
You removed the legitimate government source I added to Aleria to support your changes. Please don't ever do that. Haploidavey (talk) 22:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Sans étiquette
Hi John, I just saw your stub for Sans étiquette. I was wondering if it may make sense to roll this into Independent Politician instead of having an independent article for the French term. The article on fr wiki seems to do it similar to the en wiki article. Thoughts? Jake Brockman (talk) 14:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sans étiquette
Hi, I'm Mabalu. John5962, thanks for creating Sans étiquette!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for this - can you please add sources and citations to show that this has potential to be more than a Wiktionary definition?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mabalu (talk) 17:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Sans étiquette


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sans étiquette. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Independent politician. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Independent politician – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jake Brockman (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! LibStar (talk) 00:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * please use edit summaries. LibStar (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Year ranges
I notice you've been updating demographic data for a large number of towns, and I commend you for that. However, you have also been editing year ranges, replacing n-dash with a hyphen (the ASCII character that's actually on the keyboard). I want to draw your attention to the Manual of Style: MOS:DATERANGE (also MOS:DASH), which specifies the n-dash as standard in these circumstances. The MOS is "a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow", so these changes are nonstandard and an unnecessary effort. Certainly the n-dash, whether entered literally, via an HTML entity, with ndash, or through the editor dropdown, is harder to enter, but the visual effect is noticeably more professional. David Brooks (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Looking more closely, I can see that the hyphen, being shorter than the n-dash, can prevent a line break in its table cell on a typical-sized browser page. This isn't always the case: the two columns in the infobox can have different widths in different pages for reasons I can't figure out. But I think the hyphen is justified in this case of a narrow field width. I've reverted the "corrections" I made. David Brooks (talk) 21:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

 * Apparently, Steve Jobs is NOT dead after all. He is living in Brazil. Check the link:

https://observer.com/2014/08/selfie-sparks-theories-that-steve-jobs-is-alive-hiding-in-brazil/ 81.131.36.98 (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize
Hello, and thanks for your contributions. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits: Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 23:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
 * The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
 * Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Hello again. A year and a half on, I see that you continue to edit without leaving summaries, which makes more work for your colleagues here. Is there anything about my above message that you have difficultly understanding? Please ask for help if you are having trouble grasping the concepts. Eric talk 12:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Aix-les-Bains does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''This is a collaborative encyclopedia. You have ignored multiple requests to use edit summaries. Do you not think the rest of us deserve that courtesy?'' Eric talk 23:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Infoboxes of French communes
Hi, could you please stop adding minuses to empty fields in the infoboxes of French communes, like you did here and here? It doesn't add any information. Markussep Talk 20:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yvoire. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Please do not simply restore your hasty additions to articles without explanation when other editors revert them. Leave edit summaries, communicate, explain yourself.'' Eric talk 09:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yvoire, you may be blocked from editing. Eric talk 22:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

France metadata Wikidata
Hi, I noticed you're reverting my edits, in which I added the France metadata Wikidata template to infoboxes for communes in France. Why did you do that? Markussep Talk 11:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I noticed you removed the France metadata Wikidata template from several articles again, for instance at Abidos, Pyrénées-Atlantiques. While I appreciate that you're updating articles about French communes, I strongly disagree with these edits, because they remove the references for the population figures and create more work for other editors when the populations need to be updated. With France metadata Wikidata, we can benefit from the automated updates at Wikidata, based on publications from the French statistics office INSEE. I will revert your edits now, and I hope you will refrain from removing the templates again. Markussep Talk 06:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I noticed you have been doing this again, at for instance Abainville and Abancourt, Nord. I will revert your edits, please stop this. Markussep Talk 09:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Population tables
Hi, could you check the references you add? The Cassini-Ehess links you added for Abaucourt and Zuani pointed to the data sheet for Aast, Pyrénées-Atlantiques instead, I corrected that. And when you add population figures for years that aren't covered in the existing references, like you did at Abaucourt-Hautecourt, you should add a reference for those data. Markussep Talk 08:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)