User talk:John768

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Middle East Eye has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Middle East Eye was changed by John768 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924657 on 2014-09-10T13:43:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle East Eye. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

We have been constantly talking about this to another admin. The information given is not accurate and this is why it was removed. I am a formal employee at Middle East Eye and this information should not be put up. I have left all links and references so I do not know why I cannot remove the rest? An answer would be great. ThanksJohn768 (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Middle East Eye has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Middle East Eye was changed by John768 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951212 on 2014-09-14T14:32:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle East Eye. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Middle East Eye was changed by John768 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950806 on 2014-09-15T16:41:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Middle East Eye with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 16:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit War
Your recent editing history at Middle East Eye shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mike V •  Talk  00:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC)