User talk:John945

Protection
Please note that your combative attitude is causing the Hindutva article to stay protected from editing for longer than it need be. I strongly recommend that you set out your concerns about the article, point, by point, on the talk:Hindutva page; and please, let those concerns be only about WP policy, and not about the effect on religious minorities in India. Thank you. Hornplease 21:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hornplease, Do you call contribution to wikipedia articles with verifiable information is combative attitude! Your recommendation to discuss point by point had been valid when I had objection with the contents of articles but I am contributing additional information reflecting other facts that are purposely ignored by pro authors. These articles are guarded like fort and none other than pro authors are allowed to add or edit and your reminding me WP policy.


 * If its not about religions minorities, then why do mention below point in “Central Concept” of Hindutva article “emphasizing historical oppression of Hindus by invading forces like the Muslims (see Muslim conquest of the Indian subcontinent) and the Christians (see Goa Inquisition) and the call to "reverse" the influence resulting from these intrusions.What is the need to mention “but came to prominence in Indian politics in the late 1980s after the events of Shah Banu Case and Babri Masjid”.


 * The very reason Hindutva or Hindu Rastra exist are for above reasons and you say it’s not about the effect of on religions minorities! With Love John Paul 10:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The effect on religious minorities is irrelevant to Wikipedia unless it is commented on by Reliable sources. We are not fixing the world here. We are providing neutral information.
 * If you object to some part of the page, remove it, and justify your removal on the talkpage.
 * The inclusion and exclusion of information is in itself an editorial choice which you must also defend, case-by-case, on the talk page. In the absence of such an effort, it appears the page will stay protected, which is not in anyone's interest. Hornplease 10:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)